Saturday 9 February 2013

why the God of the Bible is not an immoral god

The issue of the very moral goodness of God has been brought into question by the New Atheist movement, notably by one of its leading proponents, Richard Dawkins. Dawkins claims that the massacre of the Canaanites in the Old Testament proves God is immoral and guilty of genocidal murder. This is an incredibly serious accusation to place against the God of Christianity, especially since Christianity teaches that God is love. How do we reconcile then a bloody event in human history supposedly by divine command with the nature and character of a God of love and a God of morality and justice? The following 45 minute lecture by Peter J Williams on the Old Testament and the character of God is a very helpful starting point in addressing this big objection.

Williams outlines the weaknesses of the New Atheist's arguments against the God of the Old Testament and provides the correct framework for contextualizing the events of the Old Testament.


I also want to address with some considerations and thoughts of my own a further objection to the God of the Old Testament, that God is responsible for the evil and sin in the world. The creation of the Garden of Eden and then God's decision to plant the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil would seem to imply that God is therefore responsible for Adam and Eve's disobedience - after all why put it there in the first place if God didn't want Adam and Eve to eat of its fruit? I have taken some quotes by a person on the internet that I think articulate this objection:

"Adam and Eve didn't have the proper cognitive functions, they didn't know what "good" or "evil" were. God didn't demonstrate it, but again leaving a doom tree in your garden where your perfect creation is...well just plain stupid. Also knowing everything means you know what those humans will do which makes this a setup."



Adam and Eve were made in the “image” of God after His likeness (Genesis 1:26, 27). God gave humanity dominion over nature and Adam named each animal (Genesis 2:20). Therefore Adam and Eve did possess proper cognitive functions in the respect that they were relational (God is triune and therefore relational – notice Genesis says let us make man in “our” image, not “my” image). Relationships imply morality as we make conscious choices about how to treat, respond and interact with one another and our environment. As God is good and there is no evil within Him, Adam and Eve’s pre-fall nature was one of moral purity, harmony and unity – in respect of their relationship to God, their environment and each other. Secondly, God gave humanity dominion over nature, which again implies cognition as dominion is an assertion of the will and mind. It also implies morality as dominion can have negative connotations of oppression, persecution, violence and abuse of power. Before the Fall humanity did not abuse the natural world like we do today through deforestation, chemical pollution of the atmosphere and oceans and intensive mining. Adam and Eve exercised their God given nature to ensure their dominion protected God’s creation not destroy it.



Knowing everything does not make planting the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil a setup for omniscience also means God knows all possibilities not just realities. God conceived of Adam and Eve obeying His command as well as disobeying; God knew the logical consequences of all potential actions by Adam and Eve. Moreover through the laws of nature causality ensues, for every action there is a reaction – cause and effect. God thus knew the effect Adam and Eve’s disobedience would have and so initiated the appropriate response in line with free will; God established the sacrificial system of the Old Testament to make atonement for that sin, which found its fulfilment in the sacrifice of Jesus Christ. The Tree of Knowledge and Good and Evil in the Garden of Eden does not negate free will it, it affirms it. Free will cannot exist without choice. Though Adam and Eve were not omniscient like God, they did possess part of His nature in His goodness. By giving Adam and Eve a solitary command not to eat of the fruit of the Tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil, God was allowing Adam and Eve to make the decision to exercise that God-given moral goodness in obedience.
 




"You can't have both free will and know the future or future events/prophecies. God placing the possibility of "sin" makes his agency responsible for it, and this destroys any chance of benevolence. This consequence was also a set up, no one in their right mind would place a tree that would harm the whole of humanity in a paradise with a deceitful snake either. Also not knowing what good/evil is, makes their "choice" not a choice, God would be at fault and responsible for all evil."




God as an agent is free – God freely created the universe and all life within it. However, God is transcendent over His creation and therefore is not bound by its laws as we are. If God were bound by the laws that govern the universe then He could not have created it; if God were inseparable from His creation than He would no longer be God, for the universe is finite and God by essence is infinite for God is uncreated and must be to be the agent of creation. Time is a dimension of this universe. But God is not bound by time or space and therefore is eternal. Therefore God does not view time sequentially as we do, who are bound by the dimension of time. But just as God as agent created the universe with the dimensions of time and space, He is also still an active agent within it – His revelation to ancient Israel, through the person of Jesus Christ and through the on-going activity of the Holy Spirit within His Church.

The existence of sin or even the possibility of sin does not make God the responsible agent for sin. Sin literally means falling short of the mark, like an arrow missing the bulls-eye by falling several metres short of the target; the mark or target in this case being the Holiness of God. It is logically impossible for God to act against His own nature – God in essence is good therefore He can do no evil – He cannot sin. Nor can God tempt anyone to commit evil and thus sin, for this would also be a contradiction of God’s nature. When God created the universe, the earth and Adam and Eve He did not create with the intention of causing evil – God is a conscious moral agent and therefore His motive for creating life is important to our understanding of sin. God cannot create sin it is logically impossible. The possibility of evil must exist for us to make moral choices. We choose to do right or wrong and therefore we are responsible for our actions. Just because God knew the possibility that Adam and Eve would make morally evil choices does not make Him responsible for those choices because they are moral agents by virtue of free will and it is impossible for God to tempt or force them to sin. The very fact that God chose to create humanity with the knowledge that this must entail the possibility of evil for us to be able to be free agents proves His benevolence rather than destroys it! God acted in His nature – everything God made was good (Genesis 1:31). God’s choice in creating human beings with free will must be judged benevolent because He acted for good in contradistinction to evil – He created a universe in which sustains life; He created a natural paradise for which Adam and Eve could call home and He had a special relationship with them in the Garden of Eden that was separate and distinct from His relationship to the rest of the created order after we were made in His image. Adam and Eve knew intimately the love of their creator and the invitation by Him to obey Him and continue to enjoy the presence and goodness of God.